FGC to Grapheus

Dearest Grapheus,
excuse my delayed replay, please (familiar occupations during the last
week end and the following days).
A part last days discussions... I have to pose you another little
difficulty I have (pardon my rough locutions): I read scholars try to
interpretate Linear A Signs on the base of Linear B correspondants or
expressions (e.g.: potokuro); otherwise sometimes I found you cannot
found your assumptions on Phaestos Disk starting from the same Linear
B (signs/expressions). It seems to me a strange logical proceeding
when it's based on uncertain time's (linguistical evolution ?)
succession.
More and better: it's possible you can separate (and abstract from)
probable/unsure sign's signifiance from sign's (probable/unsure,
syllabic or not) sound? I mean: can you (easily, opportunistically:
when you need) adjust your interpretation without a constant
"converting" method?
I hope I was able to present my mind in a quite comprehensible way...
else...
Furthermore, about "my interpretations", you can have, obviously by
combinations, many of them.
Thank's the same when you reject all my absurdities.
FGC
.