sci.lang

• Thread Index

---

• Re: finally, a non-cretinous exposition of the Laryngeal theory
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Does all this info appear in WWS?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Is cot/caught a merger or a neutralization?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Does all this info appear in WWS?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "water" indicates that English is broken
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• www.ptstore.cn use paypal payment sell nike basketball shoe and other shoes
  • From: www.ebay2008.com
• Re: "water" indicates that English is broken
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shabbiness & scuffing (from Latin scabo -ere; OE sceabb/scafan)
  • From: Larry Swain
• Re: "water" indicates that English is broken
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Shabbiness & scuffing (from Latin scabo -ere; OE sceabb/scafan)
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Shabbiness & scuffing (from Latin scabo -ere; OE sceabb/scafan)
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: "water" indicates that English is broken
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• "water" indicates that English is broken
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: finally, a non-cretinous exposition of the Laryngeal theory
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: finally, a non-cretinous exposition of the Laryngeal theory
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Shabbiness & scuffing (from Latin scabo -ere; OE sceabb/scafan)
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: jimbo.tyson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: jimbo.tyson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Baghdad
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: finally, a non-cretinous exposition of the Laryngeal theory
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• finally, a non-cretinous exposition of the Laryngeal theory
  • From: analyst41
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
• Re: The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• The letter that is not a phoneme.
  • From: GrayvYard Mushruumz
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Teaching "A Deeper Look" 1-6-81
  • From: mcinnez
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: analyst41
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: The name "Bayh"
  • From: lorad
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: lorad
• Re: The name "Bayh"
  • From: alan
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• The name "Bayh"
  • From: Richard Fangnail
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: spelling of devoiced consonants
  • From: Andreas Prilop
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Chopard L.U.C Steel Black Mens Watch 16/8413
  • From: blog419
• Hamilton Khaki Navy Frogman Titanium Green Canvas Mens Watch H77445533
  • From: blog419
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: spelling of devoiced consonants (was: freit)
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: mb
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: spelling of devoiced consonants (was: freit)
  • From: Marco Pagliero
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: spelling of devoiced consonants
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• when did oinos become oinos/oikos/oiwos ("one")
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: mb
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: mb
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Unsubordinated verbless partitive clause?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: jimbo.tyson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Finnish language online
  • From: jmkark
• Re: Survival of laryngeals in Armenian and Albanian
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Survival of laryngeals in Armenian and Albanian
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: mb
• Meaningless affixes (was: Being svejked)
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: John Swindle
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: paul . kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Marco Pagliero
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: izzy
• part time jobs
  • From: ksvenkat
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Amen
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Arne Dehli Halvorsen
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Bear, a Magdalenian test case
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Silent language?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Silent language?
  • From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: mb
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: mb
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Jack Campin - bogus address
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: mb
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Uploaded New Learn Spanish Video - Human Body
  • From: jrichman
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Chewbacca
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Pat
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Beheaded Accipiter
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: mb
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Darkstar
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: John Swindle
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Sumerian numerals
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: garabik
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: Being svejked
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: noesy_parker
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Italo
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Jack Campin - bogus address
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: John Swindle
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: John Swindle
• Re: Sumerian numerals
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: A bedside reading all about letters
  • From: hagen
• Re: A bedside reading all about letters
  • From: hagen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: mb
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• A bedside reading all about letters
  • From: hagen
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Laz in Poland?
  • From: Chewbacca
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Laz in Poland?
  • From: Jack Campin - bogus address
• Sumerian numerals
  • From: Herman Rubin
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Dan McGrath
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Hatunen
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: noesy_parker
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Emungo
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• That lucky Chinese number eight
  • From: John Swindle
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: David M. Jones
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: David M. Jones
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: David M. Jones
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Hatunen
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: mb
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Hawk the eagle
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: I am a truly dislike'rof blood drinking
  • From: hagen
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Nath Rao
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Georgians, Armenians are supermen???
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Yusuf B Gursey
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Ossetian sociolinguistics?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Fifty Verbs added to Learn Hebrew Verbs
  • From: jrichman
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: mb
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Lanarcam
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: jimbo.tyson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Joe Fineman
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Zyxt in the OED
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Zyxt in the OED
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Zyxt in the OED
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Zyxt in the OED
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• In search of the Good and of the Evil
  • From: abra . ricerca2
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Nathan Sanders
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Craoibhin66
• I am a truly dislike'rof blood drinking
  • From: Hagen
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: DKleinecke
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: analyst41
• Re: pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
  • From: Andrew Woode
• Re: Spanish and Arabic for 'duck'
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Martin Str|mberg
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Martin Str|mberg
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Martin Str|mberg
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• syntax in new thread
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: analyst41
• pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Patrick Karl
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Emungo
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: mb
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: good introduction to formal grammars
  • From: DKleinecke
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: lorad
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Spanish and Arabic for 'duck'
  • From: Douglas G. Kilday
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
  • From: Richard Wordingham
• Re: etc
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: etc
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: etc
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: wugi
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: etc
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: analyst41
• Re: etc
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: pistasch
  • From: lorad
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: lorad
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: etc
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Trond Engen
• I'm not a Jew
  • From: numberandsletters
• etc
  • From: numberandsletters
• Hyper-divergence amongst IE languages early on...
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: DKleinecke
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Christian Weisgerber
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: American Indian names
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• American Indian names
  • From: Richard Fangnail
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Lutherans
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Panu, you are NOT a "g-vnoed". It was only a joke.
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu, you are NOT a "g-vnoed". It was only a joke.
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Jens S. Larsen
• Lutherans
  • From: numberandsletters
• Panu, you are NOT a "g-vnoed". It was only a joke.
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: a suicide? hahahahaha
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: a suicide? hahahahaha
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: a suicide? hahahahaha
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Trond Engen
• a suicide? hahahahaha
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu's spin
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: good and bad
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Ruud Harmsen
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• good and bad
  • From: numberandsletters
• Panu's spin
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• Re: it's laundry day today :-(
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: subtle vowel differences?
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Prai Jei
• subtle vowel differences?
  • From: analyst41
• it's laundry day today :-(
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: mb
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Panu Hoglund interfering in Irish politics
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu Hoglund interfering in Irish politics
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Panu Hoglund interfering in Irish politics
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Ekkehard Dengler
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: [sv] pistasch
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Parses only in editor's mind (SFGate)
  • From: Ron Hardin
• Re: pistasch
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Páirtí Cumannach na hÉireann
  • From: Craoibhin66
• [sv] pistasch
  • From: Helmut Richter
• Páirtí Cumannach na hÉireann
  • From: numberandsletters
• Mise Fódhla
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu Hoglund buys house in Ballsbridge?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: lorad
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Panu Hoglund buys house in Ballsbridge?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Panu Hoglund the crypto-Jewish "faux-anti-Semite"?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Irish rally crashes.
  • From: Aidan Kehoe
• Panu Hoglund the crypto-Jewish "faux-anti-Semite"?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: criminal repercussions for Panu Hoglund: keskusrikospoliisi
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu Hoglund defending himself
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• question regarding usage of Greek "stigma"
  • From: msadkins04@xxxxxxxxx
• Panu Hoglund defending himself
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Panu Hoglund's emotional age
  • From: soconn1
• criminal repercussions for Panu Hoglund: keskusrikospoliisi
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Panu's future shooting rampage?
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Giuliano Bonfante (1904-2005) Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: PANU HOGLUND = BOY
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: PANU HOGLUND = WOMAN-HATER
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Panu Hoglund's emotional age
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Panu's future shooting rampage?
  • From: numberandsletters
• Panu Hoglund's emotional age
  • From: numberandsletters
• PANU HOGLUND = WOMAN-HATER
  • From: numberandsletters
• PANU HOGLUND = BOY
  • From: numberandsletters
• PANU HOGLUND = BOY
  • From: numberandsletters
• PANU HOGLUND IS A BOY
  • From: numberandsletters
• PANU HOGLUND IS A BOY
  • From: numberandsletters
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Fairy tale in Science.Lang
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: A Call for Reassessment
  • From: postmaster
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: John Atkinson
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
  • From: LEE Sau Dan
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
  • From: Adam Funk
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Patrick Karl
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: Conversation with a deaf person (Extracts) about the Phaistos Disk.
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Conversation with a deaf person (Extracts) about the Phaistos Disk.
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
  • From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Brian M. Scott
• Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: Joachim Pense
• proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  • From: analyst41
• sicence & technology if u click u will get dollers free
  • From: bala
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Wholesale (WWW.SNEAKERSNTRAINERS.COM) Air Jordan Melo M4 sneakers
  • From: www.sneakersNtrainers.com cheap wholesale Nike air jordan sneakers
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Paul J Kriha
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Bart Mathias
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Trond Engen
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: analyst41
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: analyst41
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: analyst41
• If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: analyst41
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: analyst41
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: Joachim Pense
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: analyst41
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: analyst41
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Nikolaj
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: Joachim Pense
• How could Panini have collected the data for his grammar
  • From: analyst41
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: António Marques
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Home Shop 18 - Uniden Dual Cordless Telephone
  • From: Ayushi Mehra
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Craoibhin66
• Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
  • From: Franz Gnaedinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Vamos a hablar claro
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Harlan Messinger
• Re: Guitar teetering
  • From: Dušan Vukotić
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: result of an action: adjective or adverb?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Best strategies for bilingual language acquisition? (inter-cultural couple)
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
  • From: mb

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)