Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:42:05 -0400
Dušan Vukotić wrote:
Is there anyone who is able to explain the homonymy of English bear
(carry, cause to be born) and bear (omnivorous animal/mammal)? Why and
how has it happened?
Because there isn't any reason why it *wouldn't* happen, and both words evolved in unsurprising ways to become, as it happens, homonyms.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by Date: Re: Vamos a hablar claro
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|