Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: "Ekkehard Dengler" <ED-RS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:20:14 +0200
Harlan Messinger wrote:
Ekkehard Dengler wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:26 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:All of which seem to have occurred in the case of *bher-, which was
On Aug 3, 6:32 pm, Harlan Messinger wrote:Sheesh, you've never even opened a "dictionary of Indo-European
Dusan Vukotic wrote:thats very instructive. Thanks.
On Aug 3, 6:42 pm, Harlan MessingerWhy don't you LOOK THEM UP and find out for yourself if you want
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dusan Vukotic wrote:And how that "unsurprising way" looked like? Could you be more
Is there anyone who is able to explain the homonymy of EnglishBecause there isn't any reason why it *wouldn't* happen, and
bear (carry, cause to be born) and bear (omnivorous
animal/mammal)? Why and how has it happened?
both words evolved in unsurprising ways to become, as it
happens, homonyms.
specific? What bear (carry, cause to be born, bring forth) and
bear (animal) have in common?
to know what they are? If you haven't bothered to look up the
details, then you have no basis for disputing them.
Maybe you believe it happened by chance?Yes.
ButWho said anything about "accidental word-developing"? What does
what if there is no accidental word-developing within the IE
vocabulary?
that even mean?
In French, the words "ou" ("or"), "où" ("where"), "houx"
("holly"), "houe" ("hoe"), and "août" ("August") are all
homonyms, derived, respectively, from the non-homonymic words
Latin "aut", Latin "ubi", Old High German "hulis", Old High
German "houwâ", and Latin "Augustus".
But of course I would use something like this to poke holes in the
standard PIE model.
I am sure there are no homonyms in any PIE reconstruction - since
the
roots" and noticed all the homophonous ones????
neogrammarian principles would prevent two words that sound alikeVery true.
in the parent language from evolving along dfferent paths in the
daughter languages.
But nothing prevents them from having taken on different affixes,
surviving with different vowel grades, different accents, etc.
apparently four- or five-way homophonous in PIE:
*bher- [boil] > Latin fermentum, Greek porphu:ro:, Sanskrit bhurati
*bher- [brown] > English brown, Greek phru:nos, (with suffix, via
*bhruHnos); and Sanskrit babhru-, Gaulish beberu-, Latin fiber,
English beaver, Lithuanian bebrus, Russian bobr, Avestan bawra (with
reduplication, via *bhebhru-); and English bear, Lithuanian be:ras
(via bhe:ro-)
*bher- [carry] > Old Irish beirid, Latin fero:, English bear,
Albanian bie, Greek phero:, Armenian berem, Sanskrit bharati,
Tocharian p&r, Russian beru, Lithuanian beriu; and OCS breme, Greek
ferma, Sanskrit bharman (with suffix, via *bhermn-); and Latin
fors, English birth, Sankrit bhrti- (with suffix, via *bhrtis)
*bher- [cure] > Lithuanian burti, Albanian bar, Greek pharmakon
*bher- [strike, bore] > Latin ferio:, English bore, Greek pharao:,
Irish bern, Lithuanian bar(i)u, Russian borju, Armenian brem,
Persian burrad, Sanskrit brna:ti; and Old Irish bruid, latin
frustum, English bruise, Albanian bresh@r (with suffix, via
*bhreus-)
*bher- [weave] > Lithuanian burvam, Greek pharos (with suffix via
*bhrw-, bolt of cloth)
How does one decide that *bher-, *bher-, *bher-, *bher- and *bher-
are separate roots, though, other than on the basis of perceived
semantic plausibility?
You'd have to be able to observe *their* etymology. Sort of like the
situation with "rare".
Obviously, but you snipped the "supposing German were Proto-Indo-European"
bit. Reconstructed roots are hard to etymologise.
Regards,
Ekkehard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
- Next by Date: Re: Panu Hoglund: Irish and British politics
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading