Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- From: Adam Funk <a24061@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:36:32 +0100
On 2008-08-04, LEE Sau Dan wrote:
>> You can read it out aloud, but it may not sound like natural
>> speech.
Adam> Not exactly, but I think we use the same language functions
Adam> to hear and understand natural speech, planned oration, and
Adam> literature read aloud.
Evidence? You've compared the MRI scans?
That's an interesting idea --- has it been studied this way?
--
Nam Sibbyllam quidem Cumis ego ipse oculis meis vidi in ampulla
pendere, et cum illi pueri dicerent: beable beable beable; respondebat
illa: doidy doidy doidy. [plorkwort]
.
- References:
- Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- From: Adam Funk
- Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- Prev by Date: Re: subtle vowel differences?
- Next by Date: Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- Next by thread: Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?
- Index(es):