Re: good and bad

On Aug 6, 7:26 am, numberandslett...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The crux of what I want to say about you is:

You fight for a good cause (language). I hope you succeed and have a
long life. This is an unexpected message possibly, but it's true.

The problem I have with you is that you are a bully, a liar, and a
spin-doctor. We are all good and bad. You can't bully people without a
reaction.

More libel. You have been insulting and bullying me for some time now.
You have failed to produce one single example of me bullying you. I
have criticized your phrase-book on linguistic grounds. For this, you
have called me several unprintable names. When I answer you back, you
call it bullying. You seem to think that you have all the entitlement
in the world to call somebody a ***-eater and whatever, and if he
answers back, that will be bullying.

It is a moral obligation to sue, and to financially ruin, a person
whose idea of justice is so skewed.

Do your language-saving thing. But don't run roughshod over people and
expect them to apologise to YOU.

You have called me by several unprintable names for the only reason
that I have criticized your phrasebook on linguistic grounds. Yet you
seem genuinely to be so skewed and perverted in your idea of justice
that you see yourself as the wronged one, when I have had the audacity
to actually answer Your Highness. What a gem of a human being.

People are not as stupid as you think they are.

You are not "people". You hardly even qualify as "human".
.

Quantcast