Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx" <ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 27, 10:38 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 27, 4:54 pm, Nathan Sanders <nsand...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Almost no linguist uses the IPA cardinal vowels exclusively to
represent true cardinal vowels.
As is obvious from the CD accompanying Ladefoged's *Vowels and
Consonants*, which includes a number of distinguished phoneticians'
demonstrations of the cardinal vowels, including Daniel Jones and
Peter Ladefoged, no two phoneticians, even those trained directly by
Daniel Jones (let alone those trained by his pupils), make the same
noises as either each other or him.
If there's a synthetic demonstration, two speech sythesizers would
presumably produce the same sounds.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Prev by Date: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Next by Date: Re: subtle vowel differences?
- Previous by thread: pre-Celtic syntax in Welsh, Irish, Gaelic, and English?
- Next by thread: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|