Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx" <ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 10, 7:31 am, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 10, 2:11 am, "ranjit_math...@xxxxxxxxx"
These would be reference noises for a given audience. Hindi speakers
don't have [E] or [&]; they have something inbetween and a little
retracted. So, both their "ax" and "ex" would come out like French
"Aix". To generate an [E] exactly 3/4 of the way from their [e:] to
their merged [E]/[&] would take a computer. To generate an [&] such
that the generated [E] is exactly halfway between the generated [&]
and their [e:] would require a computer too.
There are varieties of English in which ax = ex.
Speaking such a variety is, unfortunately, detrimental to advanced
one's career in a field of endeavor where one communicates primarily
with people rather than with computers or machines. How many CEOs
(including Presidents of Universities) have you heard, with ax = ex?
What makes you think that the brain's response to linear scales is
linear?
In the case of formants, the linearity of scales is arrived at by
measuring distances between formants of vowels in people's speech; the
frequencies are clearly in artithmetic rather than geometric
progression. If babies learn to reproduce them, their brains must
respond linearly.
Why do you think the scale of decibels is logarithmic?
Decibels, in psychoacoustics, are not linearly perceived. In addition,
equal decibels of different frequencies are not perceived as having
equal loudness which is why we have Fletcher-Munson curves.
Now _you're_ the one mixing together / / and [ ] .The Hindi speaker's /e:j/ is realized as [e:i] which is very differentNonetheless, it is the (American?) pronunciation of the word."Aerate" is three syllables.The 3 syllable pronunciation in Hindi speakers' English would be
[e:j@re:t.] which tends to sound much grosser to Anglos
Where the realization comes from is the way I had to put it once I
figured that our [ej]s were different diphthongs; I might add that in
Hindi, it comes from a sequence of two phonemes /e:/ and /j/ whereas
in English, /eI/ is a single phoneme. To illustrate the Hindi
pronunciation, Brazilian Portuguese, in the word "baia", has a
diphthong ending in an equally high [i] before a vowel which makes it
strikingly different from the Anglo's pronunciation of "buyer". This
[i] also occurs in the diphthong in their "cadeira" albeit not
followed by a vowel in that word.
from anything preceding a vowel in American pronunciation. Americans
probably have something between [EI] and [eI].
Which I suppose might be a weird rendition (with final stress) of the
name of the Afroasiaticist and Africanist Chris Ehret.
He's at UCLA. Even with stress, Americans wouldn't pronounce [ret]
with the first vowel in a German's pronunciation of "Beethoven" which
is the vowel I mean by [e:].
Our concern is with the first syllable.
About the 1st syllable you're right.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- References:
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Prev by Date: In search of the Good and of the Evil
- Next by Date: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Previous by thread: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Next by thread: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|