Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: "Richard Wordingham" <jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:30:49 +0100
"Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:09:30 +0100, Richard Wordingham wrote..."Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1dmrrqvch7xcw.13lgjo7ecc8w2$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't know of anyone who recognizes turned-a as an English
phoneme. The English view is that <hiccup> is /'hIkVp/.
I transliterated to the IPA system.
You simply made a mistake: the *phoneme* in question is IPA
inverted-v, Kirshenbaum and SAMPA /V/, not IPA turned-a,
SAMPA /6/.
Are you promoting a phonetic traditional orthography? When vowels change, transcriptions must change. Otherwise, we may as well use modified orthography. I deliberately chose to use /ɐ/ rather than traditional, but now wrong, /ʌ/.
Richard.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- References:
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Prev by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Next by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Previous by thread: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Next by thread: Re: Redefining [a] and [æ]? or using a better vowel quadrilateral?
- Index(es):