Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:25:18 -0400
Dušan Vukotić wrote:
On Aug 12, 12:50 am, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dušan Vukotić wrote:On Aug 11, 10:51 pm, Harlan MessingerYes, it is an error, and I already pointed out to you that the page
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dušan Vukotić wrote:You are right. I wanted to say Spanish soft "c" which is pronouncedOn Aug 11, 2:12 pm, Harlan MessingerYou're just going to keep making this stuff up, aren't you, under the
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dušan Vukotić wrote:This is the exact position of the sound - lamino-predorsal [s] - I amOn Aug 11, 8:57 am, Dušan Vukotić <dusan.vuko...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Since [s] is the IPA representation for an alveolar sound (which means,I cannot find neither in books norExcept this picture I posted in some of my earlier messages
on the web that anyone explains the position of the tongue wen
fricative /f/ is spoken.
http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/ling/shared/Phonetique/Schemas/labiode...
http://www.unil.ch/ling/page24535.html#2
The phoneme /f/ could be placed among the other "hissing" sounds (s,
z) and if you utter sequentially these sounds (s, f, z, h) you will be
able to feel that your tip of the tongue is behaving identically; i.e.
it touches the lower teeth
http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/ling/shared/IntroPhonEnglish/siffl.GIF
by definition, that the tip of the tongue is in contact with the
alveolar ridge, behind the upper teeth), it follows that this picture is
a mistake. And, in fact, other information on the same page shows that
it's a mistake. (The page, for the rest of you, is at
http://www.unil.ch/ling/page24535.html
). For one thing, the explanation of this picture and the contrasting
one given for "hushers" (like [S] or, in real IPA, [ʃ]) says,
"Among the fricatives below are ones described as hissers and hushers.
The realization of a hisser requires a high degree of tension in the
tongue: a groove is formed along the whole length of the tongue, in
particular at the place of articulation where the air passes through a
little round opening. The hushers are produced similarly, but with a
shallower groove in the tongue, and a little opening more oval than
round. The lips are often rounded or projected outwards during the
realization of a husher (see figure 3.14 below)."
Since the two pictures show the production of two sounds that are NOT
produced similarly, NOT differing only in the manner described, it's
apparent that someone made a mistake with the first picture. For another
thing, the page, further down, takes up [s] again, and in *that* location
http://www.unil.ch/ling/page24535.html#3
it shows *this* image:
talking about (like in sober, soap, miss):
http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/ling/shared/IntroPhonEnglish/siffl.GIF
You are talking about apical /s/, the "lisping" one (like /s/ in most
of Spain)
delusion that you're talking to people who aren't deeply familiar with
the languages of which you speak? The /s/ in the Spanish of Spain,
spelled "s", is [s]. The "lisping" sound spelled "z", as well as "c"
before "e" and "i", is [T] (or [θ]), it's an interdental fricative (as
opposed to the alveolar fricative [s]), with the tip of the tongue
between the teeth, and it most certainly is not an apical /s/.
Have you got any more inanities for us?
like "s" or somewhere between "s" and "z". It is inter-dental, of
course, but it is unimportant for this discussion. What is important
is that /s/ is prevalently predorsal and not apical consonant and that
the above picture is not an error.
itself indicates in two different ways that it is. [s] doesn't change
just because you're talking about another language. If there a language
*does* have a sound that calls for a point of articulation of the tip of
the tongue against the lower teeth, then it isn't [s].
No one is saying (especially not me) that the point of articulation of
the sound [s] is between the apex of the tongue and the lower teeth.
It is articulated with the tongue blade against or close to the
superior alveolar ridge.
Well, then, what was your point? Why in the world are we even talking about [s] then? We were talking about YOUR ridiculous and completely false contention that one MUST have the tip of one's tongue against one's lower teeth when pronouncing [f], or else that it would be TERRIBLY, TERRIBLY DIFFICULT to pronounce it without having the tip of the tongue against the lower teeth. And then you hauled out a mistaken picture that purported to be about [s], which isn't [f], and, as usual, because you are hopelessly incapable of focusing on a topic, got completely off the track. Either get back on the track or let's forget it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Next by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading