Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: "Ekkehard Dengler" <ED-RS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:38:32 +0200
John Atkinson wrote:
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
On Aug 6, 11:09 am, "John Atkinson" <johna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
On Aug 6, 9:17 am, "Ekkehard Dengler" <ED...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And apparently stranger things have happened. My favourite
weird-but-(probably)-true etymology is "tabby":
"al-3atta:biyya(t), a suburb of Baghdad" > "striped silk">
"striped cat" > "cat" > "spinster" > "gossip". That's quite some
distance covered in a handful of centuries.
You missed out the first step. The suburb got its name from Prince
Atta:b, the great grandson of Omeyya
? Where did it take the last two steps?
England, a couple of centuries ago (used by Byron, among others).
Though this meaning may be influenced by the woman's name Tabitha,
'tis said.
And what about "Tabby: (South Atlantic U.S.) A mixture of oyster
shells, lime, sand, and water used as a building material."
Are you suggesting that's the same lexical item?
As I said, not necessarily -- but it could well be, I suppose. Using
an Ekkehard-style argument, a wall built of cement full of oyster
shells would have a mottled appearance, like the coat of a tabby cat.
It's at least as plausible as naming the cat after the silk.
I agree (of course), but let me clarify just in case that I was not trying
to pass my ad-hoc etymologies off as real; my point was just that they
couldn't be ruled out on the basis of implausibility.
Regards,
Ekkehard
.
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: John Atkinson
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading