Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 12, 3:42 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And where do your "Magdalenian laws" come from? From your own
imagination.
Any scientific law comes from imagination, or intuition,
or whatever. The important step is to formulate those
laws and then to U S E them in a systematic manner.
I used them in a systematic manner to mine Magdalenian
permutation groups, and now I use my reconstructions
for explaining words, for example bear. PIE scholars
don't agree on an etymology of bear, there are several
propositions; Mallory and Adams 2006 don't even try.
Relying on my reconstruction BIR meaning fur, especially
the fur where a newborn was laid on, I effortlessely solved
the problem, my etymology of is far more encompassing
than the PIE tries, and so I do contribute to linguistics,
my four laws can be taken seriously, they stood another
test, and I seriously challenge PIE from now on. It is not
a fairy tale, as the title of this thread suggests, but it does
not reach deep enough, whereas Magdalenian does.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Craoibhin66
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Patrick Karl
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading