Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales

From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:53:43 -0400

Franz Gnaedinger wrote:

Richard Fester observed that inverse forms
have related meanings, for example in the
case of KALL and LAK, and I made the same
observation in this and many other cases.

So you aren't the only one who thinks his fantasies are factual. This isn't a revelation.
.

References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Patrick Karl
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
  - From: Franz Gnaedinger

Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
Next by Date: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread