Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?

Joachim Pense wrote:
John Atkinson (in sci.lang):

Joachim Pense wrote:

Probably the redirect should be changed to point to "Hieroglyphic
Luwian" instead.

Erk. Only if there's an article with the title "Hieroglyphic
Luwian", which there probably isn't, no?

There is one.

I was too lazy to look.

Anyway, why don't you edit the redirect so it points right then? (If you haven't already.)

J.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
    ... Luwian", which there probably isn't, no? ... why don't you edit the redirect so it points right then? ... the "Hittite Hieroglyphs". ... I guess, while we're at it, it would be a definite improvement to the "Ossetic language" article to change the phrase "Hittite Hieroglyphic script" to "Anatolian Cuneiform script". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
    ... Probably the redirect should be changed to point to "Hieroglyphic ... Erk. ... Luwian", which there probably isn't, no? ... Hieroglyphs". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
    ... John Atkinson: ... Probably the redirect should be changed to point to "Hieroglyphic ... Erk. ... Only if there's an article with the title "Hieroglyphic Luwian", ...
    (sci.lang)