Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 17, 12:18 am, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:15 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<ranjit_math...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
doesn't occur even once in the King James Bible (the two apparentWhat's so bad about "off of"? What is the more correct way to say
this?
occurrences are not the "off of" we are talking about)
So what?
What is the global conditioning factor of the language of the King
James Bible?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: Adam Funk
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: Craoibhin66
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- References:
- observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: analyst41
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: 2.7182818284590...
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: analyst41
- Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by Date: Re: Ossetian sociolinguistics?
- Previous by thread: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Next by thread: Re: observable language change - "off of" makes it to the NY Times
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|