Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Trond Engen <trondnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:42:23 +0200
Brian M. Scott skreiv:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:30:33 +0200, Trond Engen
<trondnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:UOKdnQnVOfIDjDvV4p2dnAA@xxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
[...]
Anyway, I do want to rerail the thread, so: I don't believe in *gwer, if that's the suggestion.
It's not.
Thanks. I read the OP as if Ringe proposed a modification of the root to fit Germanic, but *gw- was obviously wrong.
*gw- (or rather *gW-) would yield Gmc. /kw-/, like in
Eng. <quern>. If I'm not too mistaken, the initial
cluster would have to be *gWh- to yield Gmc. /b-/, Lat.
/f-/ and Gk. /tH-/, and even that is uncertain in the
case of Germanic.
The root in question is *g'Hwer-; Lithuanian <z^ve.rìs>
'beast' shows that it has *g'Hw, not *g'WH. (Ringe assumes
that in PGmc. *g'Hw- would have fallen together with *gWH-
to yield *gWH- > *gW- > *b-; this would apparently be the
only example of *g'Hw- at all, though there are examples of
*gWH-.) Latin /f-/ isn't a problem: /f-/ is the regular
outcome of PIE *g'Hw- (and indeed of *g'H- before *u as
well).
Ah. But didn't depalatalization take place early in the development of Proto-Germanic? Then, long after *g'Hw- > *gHw-, we would have *gHw- > *w- as in the "wife" word.
--
Trond Engen
- advocating one law for women and beasts
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Craoibhin66
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: David M. Jones
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Craoibhin66
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Trond Engen
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Trond Engen
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Brian M. Scott
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
- Next by Date: Re: Bear, a Magdalenian test case
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|