Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:52:51 -0400
Franz Gnaedinger wrote:
On Aug 19, 1:30 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Non sequitur. No one denies the theory that solar energy can be used as
a source of power, so it isn't relevant to your claim about the
rejection of new ideas.
What a deliberate stupido you are. One hears always
the same argument against solar energy: the solar
cells are not efficient enough, efficiency in the best
case, in the very best case, only seventeen percent,
If that's true, then it's a valid factor to be considered. You're whining about ideas being rejected for no reason, just because they're new ideas. Or are you under the impression that all new ideas should be blindly accepted, without regard to their validity?
And you deliberately snipped my lines where I tell
about the new research to use every color of the
spectrum to gain electricity, which can result in an
efficiency of eighty percent,
Because I had nothing to say to it. What is this obsession of yours with having all your words pasted ad infinitum?
and then solar energy
is absolutely able to play an important role in energy
supply.
Which has nothing to do with the rejection of new ideas.
You always deliberately snip my crucial lines.
I called you a liar before, now I call you also a cheat.
Your words are exactly where you put them: in your message. They do not have to be repeated in every single message the follows it, and they *shouldn't* be kept by people who aren't planning to address them, because it makes each subsequent message harder and harder to work with and obscures the *new* material being added.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- References:
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: analyst41
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Pat
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Prev by Date: Re: Silent language?
- Next by Date: Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- Previous by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by thread: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|