Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- From: "John Atkinson" <johnacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:50:30 GMT
analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pehook/bangani.abbi2.html
This feat would have to rank with Sassure's "prediction' of
laryngeals, since I had only vaguely heard of Bangani while I was
formulating my theory.
From all I've heard, Zoller's Bangani data is pretty sus, and his theorythat it's a centum language has been dead for years. But it was quite exciting while it lasted. See the discussion at
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pehook/bangani.tuite.html
For those who prefer not to believe anything they read on the web, here's a book reference:
Beekes, Comparative IE Linguistics (John Benjamins, 1995) p 19-20
J.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- References:
- If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- From: analyst41
- If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- Prev by Date: Re: proof that most etymologies are only fairy-tales
- Next by Date: Re: Silent language?
- Previous by thread: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- Next by thread: Re: If this proves to be authentic, I have my Kentum proto-prakrit
- Index(es):