Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor



analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx skreiv:

a clarification. I don't mean that the form of every word must have a reason.

Actually, there's no opposition to your claim that reasons exist, but because you claim regularity where there's very little of the sort, and because you keep telling what linguists don't do. Linguists and philologers put much effort into the search for the reasons of every irregular form. And not only for linguistic reasons. Loans can tell much about both the involved societies at the time. As is the case with the IA words in Mitanni.

There's nothing new with the interest for borrowing of numerals. It's known that when a whole row of numbers is replaced it's usually due to trade being conducted in a foreign language. A single number could be the result of some advanced sociolingiuistic mechanism -- perhaps having a central position in some imported aspect of culture, like the legal system, new military tactics or the myths of an incoming religion, or perhaps being a way to avoid a shibboleth. These things are much more difficult to solve, but they do happen. The first two ordinals seem to be in a special position ... oh, I see there's an other thread for that now. But often, in spite of all research, from all possible angles, the reason will remain unknown, hidden in a distant past or due to influences one can't trace.

If a speech community has a more or less stable language and if at a
certain point in time, (due to contact or innovations by a subset of
the community ) more than one form becomes possible for some words,
the form(s) that ends/end up winning would be governed more or less
deterministically by reasons that come from the stable parts of the
language.

For some reason -- for some value of reason -- likely an odd sociolinguistic one, unpredictable in advance, but with some luck discernible in hindsight. Take a look at the system in Swahili.

--
Trond Engen
- going for numbers
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
    ... Actually, there's no opposition to your claim that reasons exist, but because you claim regularity where there's very little of the sort, and ... Linguists and philologers put much effort into the search for the reasons of every irregular form. ... A single number could be the result of some advanced sociolingiuistic mechanism -- perhaps having a central position in some imported aspect of culture, like the legal system, new military tactics or the myths of an incoming religion, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: OT:Actual Quotes from OBAMA book
    ... When our president can lie on national television AND in the courtroom, and not get punished in any way it's safe to say that our legal system has failed utterly. ... As such you have little regard for our legal system, but hardly for the reasons you claim, and you reinforce that with each post. ... and that you are happy to game the system so that it's perfectly fine for lecherous old married men to pound on sweet young employees in the Oval Office. ... Stranger still how many of these same women would later become supporters of Clinton's cuckolded wife in her run for the presidency -- this the same humiliated wife who behaved in precisely the same meek, door-mat style that the women's movement has advocated against. ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: shutdown for shabbat?
    ... for other possible reasons it may be forbidden. ... Sometimes the judge would see no immediate justification to ... Just don't call it a legal system. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: "The Only Thing They Learn" -- does anyone else find it
    ... What you mean "we" Kemosabe? ... uplenty of people even now say "the reasons were not NEITHER ... Have fun with some future legal system. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: update KRS From dictionary of linguistics on net
    ... all reasons in the word to look - if you don't accept that what's called a ... I take it that you aren't aware that apart from the linguists mentioned by ... > Inger E. Johansson wrote: ... > article is M. Zalar. ...
    (sci.archaeology)