Re: was did
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 18, 6:27 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:50 pm, Bart Mathias <math...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
What I think is happening is that ...isn't contrived and has 4 vowels
in a row. I wonder what the limit is.
Those look, in a way, even more like verbs than like vowels. Anyway,
either way, it's seven.
Bart Mathias
I meant verbs of course. I wouls suspect that a string of >= 5 verbs
can only occur in contrived examples.
This is from a 1920s Book of Knowledge:
John, where James had had had had had had had had had had had a better
effect on the teacher.
.... had had "had," had had "had had"; "had had" had had ...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: was did
- From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: was did
- References:
- was did
- From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: was did
- From: John Swindle
- Re: was did
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: was did
- From: John Swindle
- Re: was did
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: was did
- From: John Swindle
- Re: was did
- From: analyst41
- Re: was did
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: was did
- From: analyst41
- was did
- Prev by Date: Re: Ordinals in English.
- Next by Date: Re: was did
- Previous by thread: Re: was did
- Next by thread: Re: was did
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|