Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 22, 3:15 am, "John Atkinson" <johna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"A permutation group is a group G whose elements are permutations of a given
set M, and whose group operation is the composition of permutations in G
(which are thought of as bijective functions from the set M to itself). The
application of a permutation group to the elements being permuted is called
its group action; it has applications in the study of symmetries,
combinatorics and many other branches of mathematics and physics."
But not, as far as I know, to linguistics.
At least, not up till now.
The principle of permutation is also present in
biology, as I explained many times. The brain
was originally just a neural nod, then it separated
into a left and a right hemisphere that first were
occupied with the same tasks but then, by and by,
took over separate tasks. This process happened
time and again, as brain areas were doubled,
first went on carrying out the same task, and then,
by and by, specializing in complementary tasks.
I claim a similar mechanism in early language.
For the sake of argument accept that RYT means
spear thrower (ancient Greek rythaer 'archer').
Now a successful hunter overcomes his prey
and may then call himself an overcomer, inverse
TYR (ancient Greek tyrant, originally with a positive
meaning, as a tyrant once cared for his people
and protected them). And when he successfully
hunted a big and dangerous animal it was a triumph
TRY (triumph being an Etruscan word). No need to
invent a completely new word every time you wish
to say something new, it's more economic to use
an existing word and turn it around, to use first
the inverse form and then another permutation,
following the biological model explained above.
This, however, only works with short words of
two or three phonemes; it works no longer with
our long and very long words. That is why this
mechanism is restricted to early language.
Superstition keeps a memory of earlier times.
Kabbalists perform permutations of words in
order to find the first word God spoke when
creating the World. This, for me, is indirect
evidence for the role permutations played in
early language. I explained all this time and again,
especially to Peter T. Daniels who was proud of
telling me and everybody else that he doesn't
read my messages.
.
- References:
- Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Magdalenian words and compounds 2006/7
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- Next by Date: Re: Words for "ordinal 2" in Germanic languages.
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- Next by thread: Re: Open Letter to the Google Company (re Panu Petteri Höglund)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|