Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx" <ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 14, 5:38 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
PIIr never existed.
Proto-Indic is what the West calls PIE (or at least the Indian dialect
of it).
Did your proto-Indic have a [z]?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians
Among the sound changes from Proto-Indo-Iranian to Indo-Aryan is the
loss of the voiced sibilant *z
Even if this was the only sound change, the language with [z] was
protoIndoIranian and the first Indic language with [z] replaced by [s]
was protoIndic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- References:
- elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Prev by Date: Re: An interesting Out-of-India argument using the Mitanni inscriptions
- Next by Date: Re: Literary phonetic alphabet
- Previous by thread: Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Next by thread: Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Index(es):