Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:54:21 +0200
ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx (in sci.lang):
On Sep 14, 5:38 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
PIIr never existed.
Proto-Indic is what the West calls PIE (or at least the Indian dialect
of it).
Did your proto-Indic have a [z]?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians
Among the sound changes from Proto-Indo-Iranian to Indo-Aryan is the
loss of the voiced sibilant *z
PIE is not supposed to have had *z, so what is the story of a *z in PII?
Joachim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- References:
- elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: analyst41
- Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Prev by Date: Re: Pronunciation of Estremoz
- Next by Date: Re: Great Article: Serva&Petroni, An Indo-European Tree & Glottochronology (July 2008)
- Previous by thread: Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Next by thread: Re: elementary Sanskrit blunder by Harvard professor
- Index(es):