Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk

On Oct 10, 3:46 pm, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 10, 3:02 pm, Ruud Harmsen <realemailons...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:37:22 -0700 (PDT): Craoibhi...@xxxxxxxxx: in
sci.lang:

On Oct 9, 7:53 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Many people have cautioned you about lying about them. I here do so
too.

Much of what Franz writes amounts to criminal libel at least according
to the laws in my country. I wonder whether he could be sued in
Switzerland. He has wronged so many people in such a way that those
people could extort astronomical damages from him and leave him
utterly destituted for the rest of his life.

Exaggerated and unjustified nonsense.
--
Ruud Harmsen,http://rudhar.com

Ruud Harmsen, are you out of your mind? I don't
accept your false accusation. I don't attack people
I only give back when I am getting attacked. For
example by you, Ruud Harmsen. The very first reply
you wrote to me was ruud, meant to harmsen me.
Normally I don't read your messages, and keep away
from you, and I asked you to keep away from me.
Recently you plonked me, and I was very glad to
see that, but I didn't trust you, expecting that you will
be back at me soon enough, and already it happens.
Someone wanted to accuse me and drag me before
the law, on the very Ph.D., but he did not succeed,
he chickened out. A general accusation as the one
above, that's LIBEL. You are guilty of libel now, and
I will remember this when I will have to write another
open letter (in my publishing thread). I consider this
a legal statement. Franz Gnaedinger, Zurich, Oct. 11,
2008, 15:45 local time.

Oh, I apologize in all form to Ruud Harmsen,
the libel came from Panu Petteri Höglund
alias craoibhi. So my above lines are directed
to Panu Petteri Höglund. He is not the first one
obsessed with me, and not my first stalker,
and not the first one who believes he can attack
me all the time and in every which way without
it having consequences. The legal statement
is this here, then. Franz Gnaedinger, Zurich,
October 11, 2008, 17:00 local time.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk
    ... to the laws in my country. ... accept your false accusation. ... I don't attack people ... above, that's LIBEL. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: OT: AGA chickenhawks
    ... broke all kids of laws. ... There is no legal justification for a preemptive attack on Iraq. ... between those nations. ... prevention and not preemption. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: OT: Religious Hatred
    ... MUST be able to argue the case against there being ANY libel laws. ... incitement to murder/terrorism/racial hatred etc, ... A defamatory statement must ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: notifying particular thread to wake up.
    ... There's a law against murder. ... So we are expected to abide by a `norm of usenetters ' even though ... today I see three exceedingly vicious attack posts by Owen, ... These laws include sentencing: the fact that I ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Talk.)rigins banned subject: 20k
    ... >>scientists, but who is too prissy to accept any criticism himself? ... > "England's libel laws are particularly friendly to claimants, ... > to prove that the libel allegedly committed against them is false. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)