Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk

On Oct 11, 3:18 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 11, 6:12 am, "Paul J Kriha" <paul.nospam.kr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

He's just demonstrated that it's possible to agree with him
for him to perceive it as a personal attack.
The third option is to ignore him, but he has shown before
that if he notices it, it upsets him too.
The fourth options is..... what is the fourth option?

The fourth or actually zeroest option is to behave
in a scientific way: to argue by providing scientific
arguments instead of spouting invectives and ad
hominems and lies and libels and menaces, and to
accept when someone else got better arguments.

Fine. come back when you have an argument, based on evidence and
deductions, as opposed to assumptions.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lets get this straight
    ... straight" to "this is what I believe, based on zero ... there was no personal attack. ... one sentence to go from "Let's get this straight" to the ... "Evidence confirming an observation is ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Lets get this straight
    ... evidence that the observation is wrong." ... there was no personal attack. ... I don't think Bob C. said it in order to have fun. ... He's probably just tired of ASI's chronic imbecility. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk
    ... for him to perceive it as a personal attack. ... The third option is to ignore him, ... Look in the mirror. ... insult everyone who responds to you and YOU don't accept the better ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk
    ... for him to perceive it as a personal attack. ... The third option is to ignore him, ... Medice, cura te ipsum. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Lets get this straight
    ... straight" to "this is what I believe, based on zero ... evidence that the observation is wrong." ... there was no personal attack. ...
    (talk.origins)
Quantcast