Re: Greek Psi
- From: Bart Mathias <mathias@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:22:02 -1000
frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 28, 2:19 am, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You still seem not to understand the concept of falsifying, nor its
central role in separating science from what Franz is doing. The one
assertion was shown false, so it was rejected.
What assertion has been shown false? Do you really
say that past- was the root of pastus? You didn't answer
my question about the root, now you claim to have falsified
me, and this makes you a real kook, Harlan Messinger.
What? Are you saying that the Kentum-Satem split thing was *your* theory? Or did you just fail to read what you are replying to? I can sort of understand that, since the posts get so long that it's hard to read the relevant parts all the time. I would thank you for editing, except I believe you edited out the crucial part.
Another thing sounds wrong in what you say here. I understood Harlan to be saying that your "theories" are unfalsifiable; if that is correct, he would hardly have claimed to have falsified one.
Bart Mathias
.
- References:
- Greek Psi
- From: wrschmidt2
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: grammatim
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: frgn
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: frgn
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: frgn
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: frgn
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: analyst41
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: analyst41
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Greek Psi
- From: frgn
- Greek Psi
- Prev by Date: Re: Who castrated Esperanto?
- Next by Date: Re: Who castrated Esperanto?
- Previous by thread: Re: Greek Psi
- Next by thread: Re: Greek Psi
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|