Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: Tak To <takto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:24:48 -0400
grammatim wrote:
Lack of knowledge of linguistics is probably a virtue in AI,
Lack of _knowledge_ is never good for anything. However,
AI researchers recognize that the linguists' _perspective_
sometimes do not help in their pursuit. Their difference
is analogous to that between TG and traditional grammar:
TG is good at explaining some phenomena (e.g., raising) while
traditional grammar is good at explaining others.
> since
anyone who _does_ know linguistics knows that human language is a
very, very, very long way from being transferrable to artificial
intelligence.
So do AI researchers.
Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To takto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr
.
- References:
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: darkstar100
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: jimbotuk2000
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: Trond Engen
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: António Marques
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: grammatim
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: darkstar100
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- From: grammatim
- Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- Prev by Date: Re: Scotticisms?
- Next by Date: Re: Etymology of Toxin
- Previous by thread: Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- Next by thread: Re: All unrelated "groups" are now called "families"!
- Index(es):