Re: Linguistic gender and perception



On Apr 6, 11:51 am, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Harlan Messinger wrote:

I take it you didn't listen to the radio article. I don't know that it
fully addresses all your questions, which I had also raised in my head,
but the article described an experiment in which children who spoke only
English were exposed to instruction in a fake language called
"Gamboozie" (sp?) with gender, and evidently within a day effects of the
instruction on students' evaluations of various objects began to show.
Not enough details were given for me to form an opinion on how sloppy or
rigorous this experiment was, so I'm interested in getting more
information.

Also, while it would add interesting data, I don't think including a
language without grammatical gender like English is strictly necessary.
If German/Spanish pairs like

Brücke (f)/puente (m)
Tisch (m)/mesa (f)
Sonne (f)/sol (m)
Mond (m)/luna (f)

lead to consistent response patterns from test subjects, that would be
significant.

But do the English-speakers go in one direction or the other, or none
at all?

I would also wonder whether neuter nouns (in languages having them)
pattern with masculine or feminine nouns, or with neither.

If she mentioned that German has a neuter, Krulwitch didn't put it in
the report.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gender neutral
    ... In fact, English has way, way less ... interference of grammatical gender than a long list of different ... It is part of feminist ideology, ... but, as things are, the argument is far from inane. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Gender neutral
    ... In fact, English has way, way less ... interference of grammatical gender than a long list of different ... tongues but surely it's the language that wastes the largest amount of ... but, as things are, the argument is far from inane. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Wiuff
    ... >>> some reasonable basis for this? ... >> "The English people is impatient of useless detail and strict logic ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Wiuff
    ... "The English people is impatient of useless detail and strict logic and has an innate gift for improvisation and "muddling through"...It is to these characteristics thet we owe the almost complete disappearance from English of all inflexional machinery which still encumbers the other European languages, the replacement of grammatical gender by natural gender, the freedom and looseness of syntax and *our obstinate retention of spelling which sometimes fails completely to represent the sound of the spoken word.* ...
    (alt.usage.english)