Re: Requalivahanus
- From: Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:49:00 -0400
Heidi Graw wrote:
>"Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:vmo51tya11s5.nt4a757natfw.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(snip)
>Brian wrote:
> In this case the name actually
> appears in Latinized form in the dative: the inscription
> reads <Deo Requalivahano Q. Aprianus Fructus ex imperio pro
> se et suis v. s. l. m.>, translated in the German Wikipedia
> article as <Dem Gott Requalivahanus erfüllt Quintus Aprianus
> Fructus aus eigenem Antrieb für sich und die Seinen sein
> Gelübde>.
Ah, thank you, Brian! This is enormously helpful.
(snip)
> There is no PIE *rehwaz: that's a Proto-Germanic form. The
> PIE form is *regWos- or the like.
Well...that confirms worship of "the True and Gracious God"..
the one and only. Quintus was just what I suspected...
a Christian!
Where in all of the above do you find the slightest indication that Quintus was a Christian?
.
- References:
- Requalivahanus
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: Requalivahanus
- From: Rasmus Underbjerg Pinnerup
- Re: Requalivahanus
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: Requalivahanus
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Requalivahanus
- From: Heidi Graw
- Requalivahanus
- Prev by Date: Re: Requalivahanus
- Next by Date: Re: Requalivahanus
- Previous by thread: Re: Requalivahanus
- Next by thread: Re: Requalivahanus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|