Re: Help you understand

On May 29, 6:51 pm, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 28 Maj, 21:34, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 28 Maj, 21:25, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

hagen wrote:
On 28 Maj, 18:30, grammatim <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 28, 11:01 am, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 28 Maj, 16:49, craoibhi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 28, 5:03 pm, grammatim <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 28, 9:41 am, craoibhi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 27, 11:51 pm, hagen <dan5m...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Help you understand thePhaistosdisc?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL3k61tETE4
Hagen
Look, Hagen, you have been told several times to stop littering the
place with your crap aboutPhaistosdisc, as you are obviously unable
to discuss anything else remotely connected with linguistics.
Why do you say "else"? His version of the P.D., unlike Grapheus/
Faucounau's, has nothing to do with linguistics.
 Correct!
Well, I reckon that confounded platter itself might be remotely
connected with linguistics.
That is your big mistake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lwnc3Y1M_sE
So you agree that sci.lang isn't the appropriate place to post your
P.D. interpretations. Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn -

- Vis tekst i anførselstegn -

No, it is bureaucrazy, if not something worser;
because thePhaistosdiscinscription has been contemplated as a
foreign text for more than one-hundred years.
 Now when I have proven it not to be language, you should support this
new developement, but you are not.

Are you saying people should support what they don't agree with? Or that
people should support anything you say because ... well, because you are
you, and you are a narcissist?- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn -

- Vis tekst i anførselstegn -

Do me the favour to study my little video a couple of times.
Hagen
P.S. What has been made out of me by this bizarre reaction  en bloc to
the Minoan calendar during twenty-five years, are yet for me to learn.- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn -

- Vis tekst i anførselstegn -

To obstruct thruth to prevail is a mistake each time it occurs.Beware
of this words of wisdom.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL3k61tETE4
Hagen
P.S. If you enjoy to regard your fellow human beings as cattles, then
creep to the grass field, where only you belong.

Dear Ole,

When will you stop deluding yourself ?.. You have NOT "proven" that it
is not a text -- Nobody is "obstructing the thruth" -- Only YOU are
deluding yourself with a "demonstration" full of approximations and
arbitrary modifications of the true figures : 241 or 142 signs changed
into 244 -- "invention" of the "reduced stems" -- "circular
reasonings", which you strangely are yourself conscious of : Example :
To quote our own words: "The gnonomic arrangement SUBSTANTIATES the
legitimacy of three stems" -- Or: "There are however
irregularities" (that you are nevertheless neglecting!) --
Unlikeliness of a calendar with only 8 months -- Improbability of a
square (or a pyramid) written in spiral -- Etc.

Moreover, your theory does NOT explain the meaning of the Hieroglyphs
-- why some of them have been obliterated and replaced by others --
why some have been "forgotten" and added later -- why these
hieroglyphs seem to be connected with SEVERAL cultures (and not only
the Minoan one) -- etc.

And at least, HOW can anybody believe in your solution when ANOTHER
ONE does exist - the "Proto-Ionian Solution - , which is coherent and
explains EVERYTHING, including the fact (developped at the last London
Conference on the Phaistos Disk) that the "Disk's Civilisation" has
obvious links a)-with the "Cycladic Culture" of the Early Bronze Age
(spiral, boat's shape, mixing of stamping and incisions, etc.), b)-
with the "Attic Culture" some 1,000 years more recent ("aspis",
feminine dress, "Herakles' club", etc) and c)-with the "proto-
Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head",
decoration of the round shield, etc.) ?..

Please, Ole, wake up !.. Stop your self-delusion !..
Your discovery of the "stems" was a good step forwards, which could
have led you to the "Proto-Ionic Solution". But you didn't exploit it
correctly, with your calendaric pre-conceived idea...

Best regards

grapheus
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Help you understand
    ... has nothing to do with linguistics. ... Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn - ... Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head", ... have led you to the "Proto-Ionic Solution". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Help you understand
    ... has nothing to do with linguistics. ... Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn - ... new developement, but you are not. ... Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head", ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Help you understand
    ... has nothing to do with linguistics. ... Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn - ... Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head", ... with 32 scores and 29 failures. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Help you understand
    ... has nothing to do with linguistics. ... Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn - ... Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head", ... opinion, you must hide a text with the same volume and with its ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Help you understand
    ... has nothing to do with linguistics. ... Thanks!- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn - ... Philistine Culture" of the XIIIth, XIIth centuries BC ("plumed head", ... "reduced stems". ...
    (sci.lang)