Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 20, 5:11 pm, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ranjit_math...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
... in a romanization standard for a tonal language?
For example, using puntuation for Mandarin tones:
kao1=kao
kao2=kao?
kao3=kao!?
kao4=kao!
I have a rather dumb question: Why do tones develop in a language
in the first place?
Language change is not teleological; there are no "because"s.
But what is perceived as the sound of a consonant is not a sound in
itself; it's a deformation of the vowel formants, up or down in pitch,
so it is possible for the closure of a final consonant to be lost with
only the pitch change remaining.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- References:
- Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- From: Mok-Kong Shen
- Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- Prev by Date: Re: How many languages don't have "until"
- Next by Date: Re: How many languages don't have "until"
- Previous by thread: Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- Next by thread: Re: Has it been tried to represent tones with punctuation ...
- Index(es):