Re: English versus German
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 1, 6:22 pm, Nathan Sanders <nsand...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<4c2f566c-da1c-4a08-9b92-18b180169...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:25 pm, Adam Funk <a24...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-07-01, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
I have seen travesties by Knuth in three areas: calligraphy,
typography, and biblical interpretation. If there's anything he's good
at, it's not anything he's attempted to popularize.
Your dubious personal prejudices do not constitute natural law (and
see <guruoe$243...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for a recent goof on the
subject). You could certainly take a lesson from Knuth's total lack
of arrogance.
I'm not aware that he's written any "popular" works, unless you count
_3:16_ as a coffee-table book.
There's another book of "theology" as well. *3:16* does double duty in
the calligraphy column. (I saw the exhibition of the orignal works at
the Wheaton College art gallery ca. 1994 and bought the poster.)
My calligraphy teacher did Genesis. He didn't like his assignment --
it's a very pedestrian verse.
One year his Christmas keepsake was the Babel story, which he wrote
out in a number of languages -- and he insisted on making the Lamed in
the Hebrew portion narrower than the other letters and refused to
accept that it was a mistake!
The typography travesty, of course, is TeX and LaTeX.
What don't you like about TeX? The page layout and paragraph breaking
routines are incredibly sophisticated.
And incredibly complicated to use. Something only a programmer could
love. (Jonathan Rodgers said that much of the delay in his translation
of Fischer's Arabic Grammar was due to the intricacies of the
programming. Nowadays it would be a cinch in Word. Soon I'll know
whether Arabic can be successfully poured into InDesign -- I've seen
claims that you need a special Middle East version for it to handle
right-to-left scripts.)
(Note that the Computer Modern
font, which I bet is what you're really talking about, is not TeX.)
That's "typography" -- type design. The default TeX font.
Knuth did not create LaTeX. That was Leslie Lamport's creation.
And it gives you Computer Modern out of the box.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: English versus German
- From: Helmut Wollmersdorfer
- Re: English versus German
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: English versus German
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: English versus German
- References:
- Re: English versus German
- From: DKleinecke
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: Adam Funk
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: English versus German
- Prev by Date: Re: The Turkic Languages in a Nutshell
- Next by Date: Re: English versus German
- Previous by thread: Re: English versus German
- Next by thread: Re: English versus German
- Index(es):
Loading