Re: English versus German
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 6, 1:54 am, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:09:09 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:b0136843-d5ae-4b0d-87b2-1f900771b768@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Jul 5, 5:32 pm, Adam Funk <a24...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-07-05, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
[...]
I don't know who Richard M. Stallman may be, but since heThen you have to tell the person who sent you the .dochttp://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
document that you are out of step with most of the
world and are unable to read documents in .doc format,
please resave it in .rtf.
lies about Word in his first paragraph, I didn't bother
reading the rest of it.
He does not. Word attachments *are* annoying, and they *do*
impede people from switching to free software. They are
tolerable *only* because OO.o deals with them reasonably
well.
He falsely claimed that Word documents are not forward- and backward-
compatible and you "have to" upgrade every couple of years to be able
to use old or new files.
The new format introduced in Word2007 (.docx) uses much less disk
space than the old (.doc) format, but Word2007 can with no problem
save in the old format (it can even be set as the default format), and
users of the earlier versions can easily download a free
"Compatibility Pack" that enables them to read .docx files and
includes all the new fonts.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: English versus German
- From: António Marques
- Re: English versus German
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: English versus German
- References:
- Re: English versus German
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: English versus German
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: English versus German
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: English versus German
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English versus German
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: Adam Funk
- Re: English versus German
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: English versus German
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: English versus German
- Prev by Date: Re: Socks and sacks
- Next by Date: Re: English versus German
- Previous by thread: Re: English versus German
- Next by thread: Re: English versus German
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|