Re: English vowel length
- From: António Marques <antonioprm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:44:50 +0100
Ruud Harmsen wrote (18-04-2011 13:38):
Joachim Pense<snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrocht:I understood that Ruud challenges the concept of phonemicity, in
particular the idea of isolating one feature and calling it phonemic and
the rest accompanying.
I do. More and more so over the past years.
Do you also object to things people do in medical or space research based on your theoretical dislike of some concepts they may build upon, even though you don't do medical or space research yourself?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English vowel length
- References:
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Alan Munn
- Re: English vowel length
- From: analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: English vowel length
- From: analyst41@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: English vowel length
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: English vowel length
- Prev by Date: Re: Example of labiodental th (Cockney)
- Next by Date: Re: Istanbul: question for Yusuf
- Previous by thread: Re: English vowel length
- Next by thread: Re: English vowel length
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|