Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds
From: |-|erc (gotcha_at_beauty.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Can the deduction theorem be used recursively?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:03:52 GMT
"Will Twentyman" <wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote
> My recommendation is that you leave all programming concepts at the door
> when you post to sci.logic.
Classic!
>
> I'll say it one more time. A list is not the same as the limit of the
> elements on the list. That is why we have the limit function/operator.
Is this induction valid?
<
<1>
>
the sequence <2> is not in the list
:: the list is missing a finite sequence of digits
<
<12>
<34>
>
the sequence <25> is not in the list
:: the list is missing a finite sequence of digits
<
<123>
<456>
<789>
>
the sequence <260> is not in the list (ignore recurring 9s)
:: the list is missing a finite sequence of digits
Case n
<
<xx..3>
<xx..6>
..
<xx..9>
>
the sequence <yy..0> (the mod_diag) is not in the list
:: the list is missing a finite sequence of digits
IMPLIES
Case n+1
<
<xx..3a>
<xx..6b>
..
<xx..9c>
<xx..0d>
>
the sequence <yy..0e> (the mod_diag) is not in the list
:: the list is missing a finite sequence of digits
THERFORE
<
<x>
<xx>
...
>
This list is missing a finite sequence of digits.
___________________________________________
Is this valid?
0
0.1
0.12
This sequence contains the diagonal, 0.12
0
0.3
This sequence contains the diagonal, 0.3
0
0.3
0.33
0.333
0.3333
0.33333
This sequence contains the diagonal, 0.33333
3
3.1
3.14
3.141
This sequence contains the diagonal, 3.141
0
0.3
0.33
0.333
..
This sequence contains the diagonal, 0.33..
Herc
- Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Can the deduction theorem be used recursively?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|