Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)
From: G. Frege (no_spam_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Exception to the rule? (Tarski´s T-scheme)"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:03:32 +0200
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:27:31 +0100, "Jeffrey Ketland"
<ketland@ketland.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't learn things [...] like you guys. Instead I fully comprehend
>>>> the meanings behind the meanings.
>
> Ah. But what about the meanings behind the meanings behind the meanings?
>
Moreover, there's a problem with "comprehend[ing] the meanings behind
the meanings": you might not be able (anymore) to see the OBVIOUS. :-)
F.
- Next message: G. Frege: "Re: Exception to the rule? (Tarski´s T-scheme)"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]