Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jun 2004 05:26:24 -0700
In article <4moCc.124060$Gx4.66500@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Peter
Olcott says...
>
>> Actually, Peter screwed up the counterexample. If you
>
>I just copied the original, allowing the reader to make
>any slight adjustments that may be required.
Thus showing that you aren't really thinking about what
you are posting.
>> are asking "Does LoopIfHalts halt?" you need to specify
>> the inputs. It has two input parameters, M and w. What
>> is Peter wanting M and w to be? Presumably, he wants
>> M to be the code for LoopIfHalts. But then what's w?
>>
>> I think what he meant to write was something more like:
>>
>> function LoopIfHalts(M):
>> if WillHalt (M, M) then
>> while true do {}
>> else
>> return false;
>
>function LoopIfHalts(bool YouSayItHalts):
> if YouSayItHalts then
> while true do {}
> else
> return false;
>
>Is this simple enough for you?
I wrote down the correct counterexample. Why do you
want to replace it by an incorrect one?
Yours makes no sense.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|