Re: Humble pie.

From: Arturo Magidin (magidin_at_math.berkeley.edu)
Date: 06/25/04


Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC)

In article <XV%Cc.64$kf2.34@newsfe3-gui>,
Andrew <stan370@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>"Arturo Magidin" <magidin@math.berkeley.edu> wrote
>
>>
>> Yes: each natural number is finite; however, the set of all natural
>> numbers is infinite.
>>
>
>I would like to proceed very carefully here.
>
>Since you agree that each natural number is finite thought the set of
>natural numbers is infinite, would I be fair in thinking, that a set which
>consisted of the set of natural numbers though with each terminated in an
>infinite string of zeros;-
>
>1000000000. . .
>2000000000. . .
>3000000000. . .
>etc.,

You are once again speaking nonsense; I don't know what you are trying
to say. A string of numbers which contains an infinite number of zeros
is NOT a natural number under any of the usual meanings of "natural
number". So a "natural number[...] terminated in an infinite string of
zeros" is an oxymoron.

Even trying to make sense of a such a representation doesn't lead
anywhere: how do we distinguish the string of digits representing "1"
from the string of digits representing "10", from the string of digits
represnting "100", etc?

>had the same cardinality as the set of natural numbers? And if not why not?

What you wrote is nonsense. Perhaps if you try to make it make some
sense, the question will be answerable. Right now, your questions have
no referent.

-- 
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
 what I accept as reality."
    --- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu


Relevant Pages

  • Re: infinity
    ... >>> Why are you assuming that there is a longest word in the language? ... >> finite, that means none are infinite, therefore S^L is not infinite either. ... > I am not assuming that there is a longest word. ... > the maximum string length, i.e. the largest finite natural number. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: .99999... still=/= 1
    ... >>2) The point of reference means how we define the counting results ... the string length and the members in the placeholders of the string. ... Note that supernatural numbers are that I have called earlier infinite ... omega 1 is behind our standard infinity in the next infinity. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
    ... or the value of the string I am discussing. ... There is no point at which any finite natural has an infinite ... They ARE the finite naturals. ... At which point has my abstraction differed from what you're ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... Can all 1's up to any finite position represent an infinite ... There is no infinite position in the string. ... And no sum ending at M represents the sum over the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... as is true for the other 9 digits, and finally, reminded you that my infinite ... The center-infinite string has its left string all zeros, ... that can't be determined in such an infinite division. ... and if you have any memory of the response which I describe ...
    (sci.math)

Loading