Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Exception to the rule? (Tarski´s T-scheme)"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (PART-THREE)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jun 2004 16:35:51 -0700
Peter Olcott says...
>
>> He doesn't fail to understand that---it's just that such mappings
>> are *irrelevant* to the halting problem. The halting problem is
>
>He was trying to tell me that there is no such thing as an incorrect
>TM.
And that's true. TMs are a *general* model of computation, not
a model of *practical* computation, or a model of *useful* computation.
A real computer program can be incorrect if it fails to do what it
is intended to do. But TMs abstract away from the intentions of the
programmer.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Jeffrey Ketland: "Re: Exception to the rule? (Tarski´s T-scheme)"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (PART-THREE)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]