Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:15:33 GMT
"Kenneth Doyle" <nobody@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9516540F5B4CDnobodynotmailcom@61.9.191.5...
> "Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
> news:ilADc.147004$Gx4.16999@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>
> > Its just a sequence of symbols on a tape, how hard is that?
> > If for example the ASCII set is the alphabet, then specifying
> > any symbol outside of this range would be a syntax error.
> >
>
> As a computer programmer, you're aware that the ASCII character set
> consists of more than just the alphabet, aren't you?
I am the patent pending inventor of several finite automatons,
what would you guess my answer would be?
- Next message: |-|erc: "Re: limitation to induction on finite bounds"
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed (PART-TWO)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|