Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots
From: Charlie-Boo (chvol_at_aol.com)
Date: 07/03/04
- Next message: Reinhold Friedrich Burger: "Re: [Find the Fallacy!!] -- 'Proof' of Monotheism...."
- Previous message: David P. Ferguson: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Maybe in reply to: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Next in thread: KRamsay: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Jul 2004 10:34:31 -0700
Kenneth Doyle <nobody@notmail.com> wrote
> daryl@atc-nycorp.com (Daryl McCullough) wrote
>
> > Now, if I can only work on my own obsession with responding to
> > these people.
>
> At the risk of adding grist to the mills of the crackpots, some of my best
> educational moments have come from lurking on threads that fit the scenario
> you describe. Don't forget the lurkers!
The correct term is "voyeur".
C-B
- Next message: Reinhold Friedrich Burger: "Re: [Find the Fallacy!!] -- 'Proof' of Monotheism...."
- Previous message: David P. Ferguson: "Re: Infinity can not exist"
- Maybe in reply to: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Next in thread: KRamsay: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|