Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion
From: Bryan Olson (bryanjugglercryptographer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/07/04
- Next message: Jack Dominey: "Re: Harassed by remote voice to skull. Yikes!"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Jul 2004 11:14:06 -0700
"Peter Olcott" wrote:
> You guys just can't be as dumb as you are acting.
> You must all just be playing me.
> Of course what I am referring to is when the variable
> "I" takes on the specific value of the counter-example
> program.
Why subject yourself to it? Wouldn't you be happier in your own
little world instead of the net? You could call yourself a
genius or god, and there would be no disagreement. You could
proclaim your new mathematics and argue your results to your own
satisfaction, and no one would correct you.
Plus it would save the time of others.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Jack Dominey: "Re: Harassed by remote voice to skull. Yikes!"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Daryl, Dave, Barb and the Georges' source of Confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
