Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 07/10/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 04:16:43 -0500
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:24:32 GMT, "Peter Olcott"
<olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>> >> >Providing the answer of Halting / Not Halting as a critique
>> >> >of the program from an infinite set of possible critiques,
>> >> >and then encrypting this critique before returning it as
>> >> >a result would make it infeasible/impossible (depending
>> >> >on the strength of the encryptation) for the counter-example
>> >> >program to thwart the WillHalt() function.
>>
>> I did get something out of this looking at it again just now:
>> The first time I looked at it I hadn't seen your other posts
>> where you mentioned "encryptation", so I assumed it was just
>
>There is such a word in the Random House unabridged dictionary
>1993, and it means the same thing as encryption.
Yes, it appears you're right about that. Silly me,
assuming that just because you don't know the difference
between who and whom and the difference between it's and
its this must be a non-word.i
>> a typo. Seeing it again here I gather you must think there
>> actually is such a word. There isn't. (If there were such
>> a thing as "encryptation", the idea that it had something
>> to do with the halting problem would be exquisitely silly,
>> for reasons noted above.)
>>
>>
>> ************************
>>
>> David C. Ullrich
>
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: The Psychology of Responding to Crackpots"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|