Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)
From: Acme Diagnostics (LFinezapthis_at_partpostmark.net)
Date: 07/11/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Next in thread: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Reply: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Jul 2004 03:24:12 -0500
Chris Menzel <cmenzel@remove-this.tamu.edu> wrote:
>On 11 Jul 2004 01:18:32 GMT, Chris Menzel <cmenzel@remove-this.tamu.edu> said:
>> A paradox is an argument in which a contradiction follows from
>> premises that we find intuitively true. Genuine paradoxes are
>> disturbing, as they show that one has a false belief, as true premises
>> cannot entail a contradiction.
>
>Not well put -- in the usual case it's not at all disturbing to find
>that one has a false belief; that happens all the time. What's
>disturbing in the case of a paradox is that something one finds
>*intuitively true* -- and hence something one would not otherwise give
>up -- is false. One therefore knows that one has to have made some sort
>of conceptual error; but the source of the error is not transparent.
I have always just called any cute logic impossibility a "paradox."
Like Zeno's Paradox, Liar's Paradox, the three "paradoxes" or
unsolvable "puzzles" Daryl posted a while back like the number of 5's
in the box, entertaining impossibilities in logic puzzle books, and the
entertaining logic reversal in the diagonal.c program like "If it
returns yes, it's no, and if it returns no, it's yes." What would be
the all-inclusive term? Logical impossibility seems too wide, i.e. lots
of impossibilities would not be similar to entertaining contradictions
or unsolvable puzzles. Please don't spend a lot of time on it.
Larry
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Next in thread: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Reply: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|