Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it
From: Martin Shobe (mshobe_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 07/11/04
- Next message: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Previous message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Next in thread: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Reply: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 13:22:21 GMT
On 11 Jul 2004 00:41:14 -0700, starofbabylon@yahoo.com
(Babylonian_Astrologer) wrote:
>Martin Shobe <mshobe@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<04v0f0tu6j56b2f0c5usnegrv70jot48le@4ax.com>...
>> On 10 Jul 2004 15:20:13 -0700, starofbabylon@yahoo.com
>> (Babylonian_Astrologer) wrote:
>>
>> >Martin Shobe <mshobe@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<ik80f0djj1k55g99k78je9h7aj4q3j23k5@4ax.com>...
>> >> Not really. The following becomes a solution (if I'm reading you
>> >> correctly).
>> >>
>> >> H(I,j)
>> >> {
>> >> while (1);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> Martin
>> >
>> >
>> >So what if it is?
>>
>> Solving it is trivial.
>>
>>
>> Yep. In fact, one can always add more Turing machines that it does
>> solve for (instead of looping).
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> >Are there no others?
>
>But, maybe there are general soloutions whose only vulnerability are
>these parameter-doubling loops. I guess that's what I was thinking. I
>had in mind something that worked like a modified UTM. I guess I'm
>being vague...
I doubt it. The reason we use those loops is because they are a very
simple counter-examples. It's very easy to show that Halts will fail
for them. That said, you might be able to solve it for enough
programs that it becomes practicle. You'll just have to live with the
fact that every now and then, it will fail.
Martin
- Next message: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- Previous message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is Incorrect (FINAL PART)"
- In reply to: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Next in thread: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Reply: Babylonian_Astrologer: "Re: the Halting Problem has a lot to it"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|