Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 07/13/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Sander Bruggink: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Sander Bruggink: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:57:16 GMT
> In fact, it makes the creation of *any* function impossible. Because you
> can always modify the original function which works so that it outputs
> an answer "encoded so that only the human user will know the meaning of
> the return value".
>
> This is a bit of an undesired result of your reasoning, isn't?
>
> groente
> -- Sander
How does that show that my method of circumventing LoopIfHalts()
would fail? Are you still on topic?
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Sander Bruggink: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Bryan Olson: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Sander Bruggink: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|