Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_att.net)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: everything is a difference"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Martin Shobe: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: George Greene: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: George Greene: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:42:18 GMT
> But you haven't refuted the Halting Problem proof, since the problem
> specifically asks if there is a Turing machine that can do it.
I am only using this National Institutes of Standards and Technology
definition of the Halting Problem.
http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/haltingProblem.html
> >
> >A fellow programmer where I work said that he thought that
> >I could win the Turing prize for this. Wouldn't that be ironic?
> >
>
> Not likely, as we already have things (in mathematics) that aren't
> Turing machines that can answer the Halting problem for Turing
> machines.
>
> Martin
Please provide a concrete example.
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: everything is a difference"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Martin Shobe: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: George Greene: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: George Greene: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|