Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_att.net)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: doubting contradiction"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:23:02 GMT
> > Yet even though this proof is not refined, it still does prevent
> > LoopIfHalts() from providing the means to show that WillHalt()
> > will not always work correctly. In other words no matter how
> > inelegant my proof may be, it still proves its point.
>
> Not quite.
>
> If your blocker is what I think it is, you've merely made the
You haven't even read what I said have you?
No its not what you think it is. Go read it and see.
> But you have not removed them.
Prove it, I have had far too much of baseless assertions.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: doubting contradiction"
- In reply to: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|