Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem
From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 07/27/04
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Marc Goodman: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:46:57 +0100
In message <HtZMc.136094$OB3.5641@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
Peter Olcott <olcott@worldnet.att.net> writes
>
>"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message
>news:2mid25Fmh7uvU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>> "Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:SXSMc.134873$OB3.24749@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> > The Halting Problem can not be solved within the degree of
>> > expressability of a TM. My solution only worked because of
>> > its more limited degree of expressability.
>> >
>> > There is no such thing as a void function in a TM, thus there is
>> > no way to make constructing the counter-example program
>> > impossible for a TM.
>>
>> I think I already asked you to stop posting this stuff, but you appear
>> to have a halting problem.
>>
>
>Well it looks like I am wrong that I am wrong again.
>This time I won't bother with anything less than a full
>refutation of the original proof. I do have a basis for
>disproving the original proof.
>
>
Do you know James Harris?
-- Richard Herring
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Marc Goodman: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|