Re: Liar paradox, one more time
From: Poker Joker (Poker_at_wi.rr.com)
Date: 07/27/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Acid Pooh: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:46:47 GMT
"Barb Knox" <see@sig.below> wrote in message
news:ce6j71$3ov$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
> In article <4106b1d4$1_2@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
> Will Twentyman <wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote:
>
<snip>
> >The use of three-valued logic (true, false, maybe) will also remove the
> >liar's paradox, yet people don't ordinarily argue that we should drop
> >two-valued logic in favor of three-valued logic.
>
> But 3-valued logic doesn't solve the "strengthened liar" paradox:
> "The truth value of this statement is 'false' or 'maybe'"
> or more concisely,
> "This statement is not 'true'".
Putting those words together might be mistaken as an assertion, but
they no more make up an assertion than the sentence: "Take out
the garbage." Or, "Take out the garbage is not true." The first
sentence is semantically acceptable but not the second and
certainly your sentence is not semantically acceptable. They are
gibberish. Of course, we can fool all of the mathematicians
and logicians all of the time because they only make up some
of the people. But they will insist that they are correct and this
statement I am making is not true.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Refutation of the DisProof of the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Next in thread: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Barb Knox: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Acid Pooh: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Reply: Paul Holbach: "Re: Liar paradox, one more time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|